🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 409+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

PANTS WIDE LEG - Trousers

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.7 out of 5 (409 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$121
$201.67
Sale
βœ“ gratis shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : NormalPattern : PrintDetails : Elasticated waistArticle number : MA321A0ST-T11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express shipment
↩️
easy-to-use Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

PANTS WIDE LEG - Trousers

Rise : Normal
Pattern : Print
Details : Elasticated waist
Article number : MA321A0ST-T11

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1232658

Category: Women > Clothing > Trousers

Original Price: $201.67 USD

Sale Price:$121 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1965 reviews
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid quality
So far, the PANTS WIDE LEG - Trousers performs as expected and it meets expectations.
26 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
finest PANTS WIDE LEG - Trousers ever
The PANTS WIDE LEG - Trousers doesn’t require special care to use.
5 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
After assorted use, it feels okay which is good enough.
9 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
flawless in every way
After some use, it is uncomplicated to use and I’m satisfied.
38 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
splendid find!
it feels okay which is good enough.
24 people found this helpful