๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.1/5 from 478+ reviews
Womenโœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Torrid retro chic rose Cardigan

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.1 out of 5 (478 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$50
$83.33
Sale
โœ“ gratis shipment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

NWT Torrid retro chic rose cardigan size 1x

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
express shipment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
easy-to-use Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Torrid retro chic rose Cardigan

NWT Torrid retro chic rose cardigan size 1x

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 584988

Category: Women > Sweaters > Cardigans

Original Price: $83.33 USD

Sale Price:$50 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

๐Ÿšš distribution & Returns

โœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.1
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 9128 reviews
ET
Emily Thompson โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท San Diego, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
fabulous Torrid retro chic rose Cardigan!
The Torrid retro chic rose Cardigan feels okay to use.
41 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Atlanta, GA

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
appreciate this Torrid retro chic rose Cardigan!
From my experience, it feels solid enough so no complaints.
49 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee
6 days ago ยท Jacksonville, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Outstanding quality
The Torrid retro chic rose Cardigan meets daily needs.
33 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Seattle, WA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
fantastic quality
In daily use, the Torrid retro chic rose Cardigan feels solid so no complaints. Nothing fancy.​
12 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท Los Angeles, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
finest decision
The Torrid retro chic rose Cardigan is worth recommending.
40 people found this helpful