🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 207+ reviews
Otherβœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Cleveland alto sax 1960-70

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.6 out of 5 (207 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$200​
$333.33
Sale
βœ“ gratis shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Used band instrument scratches and scuffs from normal 60 years of use. Needs pad job

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express shipment
↩️
easy-to-use Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Cleveland alto sax 1960-70

Used band instrument scratches and scuffs from normal 60 years of use. Needs pad job

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Other products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 508992

Category: Other > Musical Instruments > Band & Orchestra

Original Price: $333.33 USD

Sale Price:$200 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days​

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7360 reviews
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding quality
The Cleveland alto sax 1960-70 is better than expected.​
4 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
faultless for my needs
The Cleveland alto sax 1960-70 feels normal quality.
41 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkable find!
The Cleveland alto sax 1960-70 design and color match the photos perfectly.
14 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent purchase
Good experience with this Cleveland alto sax 1960-70.
19 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez
1 week ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
The Cleveland alto sax 1960-70 feels okay, not inexpensive.
17 people found this helpful