🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 946+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Kodak Disk protector

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.4 out of 5 (946 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6
$10
Sale
βœ“ gratis shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

UNO pened Kodak Disk protector.Please see pictures for further details.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express shipment
↩️
easy-to-use Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Kodak Disk protector

UNO pened Kodak Disk protector.

Please see pictures for further details.​

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 309041

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Cameras

Original Price: $10 USD

Sale Price: $6 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2619 reviews
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely flawless
The Kodak Disk protector performs as I expected it to.​
32 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Five stars!
From my experience, the Kodak Disk protector feels solid and it meets expectations.
19 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase 
10 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid quality
So far, the Kodak Disk protector performs as expected and it meets expectations. Nothing fancy.
36 people found this helpful

AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Fort Worth, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this​
Good material quality Kodak Disk protector.
8 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
Personally, the Kodak Disk protector performs as expected so it’s acceptable. Works fine so far.
13 people found this helpful